Skip to Main Content

Mrs. Leveillee's Personal Wellness Project: Website Evaluation

Research a personal wellness topic and share your findings creatively with your health class.

CRAAP Test

Developed by the Meriam Library at California State University, Chico, the CRAAP Test is a method that will assist you in evaluating resources to see if they are a good fit for your research project. There are five different criteria you can consider when evaluating a source:

C. Currency - When was the source created or last updated?

R. Relevance - Does the source provide you with enough information on your topic?

A. Authority - Is the author an expert on the topic you're researching?

A. Accuracy - Is the information correct?

P. Purpose - Why was the information created?

Learning Target & Success Criteria

Learning Target: I can evaluate a website for reliability.

Success Criteria: I will have met the Learning Target when I have used the CRAAP Method to evaluate a website.

Website Evaluation

Assess These Websites

Domain Extensions

Extension 
Meaning
Reliable?
.com                                       
  • commercial website
  • businesses, individuals, and non-profits can create them
  • Sometimes they are and sometimes they're not. Use the CRAAP test to evaluate .coms carefully
.edu
  • educational websites sponsored by higher education institutions
  • They are generally considered credible websites
.org
  • organization websites, often non-profit
  • They can have great information, however the information can be skewed to represent the organization's agenda. 
.gov
  • government websites
  • Information shared by the government is considered reliable
.net
  • websites that belong to a specific network
  • Many types of websites fall under this category and all need to be analyzed for credibility.

Librarian

Profile Photo
Christy Minton
Contact:
70 Winslow Ave
Leicester, MA 01524
508-892-7055

Feedback

During the website evaluation, which criteria did you find most difficult to locate?
Currency: 6 votes (8.22%)
Relevance: 5 votes (6.85%)
Authority: 30 votes (41.1%)
Accuracy: 20 votes (27.4%)
Purpose: 12 votes (16.44%)
Total Votes: 73